Primary Document - Bernard Weiner's Anti-Bush Screed
Normally, I try not to spend too much time worrying about the more
colorful members of the left. I find their prose pretty
tedious, almost certainly because of the human tendency to glaze
over when somebody prattles on about something one doesn't agree
with. I also find much of their argumentation difficult to follow.
Although Duke University's philosophy department chair might chalk
this up to the fact that conservatives are just dumber than progressives,
I think it's possible that they just don't write very well.
A friend of mine, who is a particularly honest sort of progressive
forwarded a long, anti-Bush screed to me. Frankly, as far as anti-Bush
screeds go, it is easily the most sane and succinct, although that's
a fairly low hurdle to clear. It weighs in at 2300+ words, which
is just under 5 days of output for me. I've decided to do a paragraph
by paragraph retort to this lengthy little rah-rah letter to the
far-left faithful. Before I do that, though, it might do to show
y'all the primary document in an unadulterated form.
What follows is every word as I got it, with the exception of a
couple spelling corrections. I tried (not very hard) to chase down
a published original, and if somebody comes up with one, I'll make
a link.
I'll serialize over the next several days my response. Since this
is serious business, I'll do my best to stay focused and not veer
off into something juvenile, but be forewarned, I'll probably lapse
into ridicule here and there, I'm not made of stone, you know.
Dr. Weiner - I give you the first salvo.
Tim McNabb
The America I Live In: Notes for the Campaign
By Bernard Weiner, The Crisis Papers
OpEdNews.Com
This is the America I live in.
A normal, average citizen, I unlock the front
door and enter my home. I don't know if anyone has entered surreptitiously
-- perhaps a sneak-and-peek job by Ashcroft's black-bag boys.
I boot up my computer to go online. I don't
know if my email is being monitored, if my keystrokes are being
recorded.
I call my attorney, about a family matter.
I don't know if communication with my lawyer, previously regarded
as "confidential," is being listened to. (This, and the
other examples above, and many below, flow from the Bush-Ashcroft
"USA Patriot Act.")
I visit my physician, and learn later that
my employer found out about a chronic condition I had and laid me
off, to keep his insurance costs down. The doctor-patient confidentiality
I thought existed is now breachable by government agencies in cahoots
with insurance companies.
This is the America I live in.
I learn about U.S. citizens who have been
thrown into military custody, with no access to the judicial system,
kept uncharged for however long Ashcroft and Bush decide to hold
them as somehow connected to "terrorists."
I know of American citizens, active in opposition
to the war in Iraq, who have been kept off commercial airlines.
Hundreds of citizens of other countries are
rounded up as suspected terrorists and sent to a prison camp run
by our government; they can rot there for years with no charges
and with no regularized access to the judicial process. To avoid
having to conform to international codes of conduct, the detainees
are not designated by the Administration as prisoners-of-war.
I hear Ashcroft telling Congress that those
who raise questions about the government's harsh police tactics
are giving "aid and comfort" to terrorists.
This is the America I live in.
In the daily newspaper, and online, I keep
running into stories about plans for future U.S. wars against other
nations -- Syria, Iran and Cuba are most often mentioned -- after
the November election, should Bush win. Moves already have started
to revive the military draft.
I read about GOP groups sending out doctored
photos of John Kerry, and passing on false rumors, based apparently
on nothing but partisan malice, about his private life.
The Bush Administration publicly revealed
the name of a covert CIA agent, apparently in retaliation for her
husband telling the truth about forged documents that were used
to justify a WMD lie. Her life is put at risk, her career is in
tatters, her contacts abroad are in danger. Revealing her name is
a felony, but the Chief Executive does nothing.
This is the America I live in.
I will be voting in my state's primary balloting
and then, of course, in November's general election. There are not
adequate safeguards against tampering with touch-screen computer-voting
machines (it's been demonstrated that they can be hacked into easily
and the tallies manipulated, with nobody ever knowing), and there
is no paper trail being used to verify the votes on most of those
machines. The proprietary software inside those computer-voting
machines are controlled mainly by three companies, one of which
is partially owned by a Republican senator and the others by avowed
Republican supporters.
Traditionally, when America (or any other
country) suffers a major civil trauma, investigations are initiated
almost immediately to find out what happened and why, witnesses
are placed under oath, and those responsible are fired, or resign,
or are indicted for their malfeasance. More than 3000 persons died
in the September 11 tragedies, but the Bush Administration did everything
possible to forestall an independent investigation about pre-9/11
knowledge, nobody has been placed under oath, and the Administration
is continuing to stonewall and cover-up today. Whatever it is they
are trying to hide must be very very embarrassing -- or criminal.
All sorts of outrageous lies and distortions
were utilized by the Administration to get Congress and the American
people to approve Bush&Co.'s war in Iraq -- the plans for which
were approved by mid-2002. All those untruths, exaggerations and
manipulations are evident for all to see these days -- which explains
why, in current polls, the first adjective that comes to the minds
of many citizens when pollsters ask what they think of Bush is "liar."
This is the America I live in.
The Bush Administration promised it would
be dedicated stewards for our air and water, but, as with virtually
every other environmental decision, has given in to whatever rollbacks
in environmental protection are desired by the polluting industries.
More arsenic in the water, more industrial sludge in the rivers,
more pollutants in the air, whatever. And when scientists raise
questions about the Administration's environmental or global-warming
policies, they are treated as the enemy -- unless the scientific
judgment conforms to the Administration's political agenda.
Bush claims to care deeply for our soldiers
and veterans, but he sends our young men and women to Iraq with
the wrong post-war battle plan -- turning them into sitting ducks
in a shooting gallery -- and without the proper body armor and armored
vehicles that would save their lives in the guerrilla battle being
waged. And he has provided no troops to guard Saddam's huge ammo
dumps around the country; these are the same dumps that are scavenged
nightly for armaments to make bombs that blow up our troops. U.S.
soldiers, poorly paid in any case, were expected to pay for their
meals while in hospital, and veterans benefits are cut back home.
The commander-in-chief apparently did not
complete his military service in the National Guard during the Vietnam
War, and appears to have gone AWOL for at least a half-year, maybe
more. At first, he claimed there are no records, trust him, he fulfilled(sic)
his responsibility, the proof being that he received an honorable
discharge. When the public didn't buy that, he dumped hundreds of
pages of records, which showed nothing conclusive. (His records
and arrest sheet reportedly were "cleansed" of anything
embarrassing before he ran for public office.) He's had years to
remember and contact members of his Alabama Guard unit, to verify
his claim that he showed up, but he has no names to suggest, and
nobody believable has come forward. But Bush is quite happy to play
dress-up soldier, and to send young men and women to fight and die
and kill in Iraq and elsewhere.
The Bush Administration doesn't include the
costs of war in Iraq in the defense budget; instead, it comes to
Congress for "emergency" appropriations -- $50 billion
here, $87 billion there -- to pay for that war-of-choice, and then
browbeats legislators into passing those requests in the guise of
"supporting the troops." (Only a share of those funds
"support the troops"; the fat slice goes to "reconstruction,"
meaning, in practice, to huge conglomerates like Bechtel and Halliburton.)
Those who don't vote for those bills know they will be smeared with
the "unpatriotic" brush.
All those billions for the Iraq adventure
are draining and bankrupting the national treasury, building up
half a trillion dollar deficit this year (and, it is estimated,
many trillions more in next seven years) that will have to be paid
for somehow -- but not by the wealthiest in our society, who are
receiving huge tax cuts. No, that bill is being paid for by the
poor and middle-class, whose public services are being cut left
and right, and whose children and grandchildren will have to pay
through the nose just to maintain the interest payments on that
humongous debt.
This is the America I live in.
A good share of the elderly, and soon-to-be-elderly,
in this country often have to face the excruciating choice of paying
the rent or buying their required medicines. The Bush Administration,
knowing something had to be done before the election, concocted
a half-baked Medicare drug-scheme that would permit the insurance
and pharmaceutical companies to make out like bandits at the expense
of true reform and aid. (Seniors no longer will be permitted to
purchase those drugs legally in foreign countries, at a discount;
the Medicare administration could get the drugs at a much cheaper
rate if it negotiated with the pharmaceutical companies to do so,
but that is now outlawed.)
Middle-class workers have paid into the Social
Security system for decades, expecting to receive their Social Security
checks as promised to help them through their retirement years.
Now, as the Baby Boomers are about to reach retirement age, there
is serious talk of cutting back on those promised payments in order
to help cover the gap in income caused by the Bush Administration's
wars and tax-cuts for the wealthy.
To distract us from examining Bush&Co.'s
appalling record of mistakes, mismanagement, incompetence, and the
ramifications of its reckless foreign adventurism and greed-oriented
domestic policy, it has become so desperate that it's chosen homosexuals
as its designated scapegoat for all that ails us in this nation.
If Bush&Co. have their way, gays will be written into an amended
Constitution as second-class citizens, something that hasn't occurred
since slavery days.
This is the America I live in.
THERE IS ANOTHER COUNTRY I LIVE IN
In this country, citizens cherish the Constitutional
protections afforded everyone, even those we may abhor. Our country
does not attack other nations as a choice of geopolitical strategy,
but only as a last resort in self-defense. The government really
feels for its citizens and their daily dilemmas in getting through
life, including the need for them to have safe, well-paying employment
and decent health-care. The administration does not turn over pollution-control
to the polluters, does not privatize away its public services, does
not favor the wealthy corporate class in its tax policies. The government
does not attempt to alter the Constitution to permit bias to be
written into law. The leaders do not use divisiveness to push us
apart but rally us to be helpful and tolerant and inclusive. The
government does not attempt to keep its citizens in a constant state
of fright. Teachers are permitted to teach and inspire, instead
of mostly programming students for fact-based test-taking. Our foreign
policy is developed in concert with our allies rather than as a
sole, swaggering superpower bully enforcing its way around the globe.
That is the America I used to live in. That
is the America I still want to live in. That is the America it is
still possible to live in, 9/11 or not, a new pre-election terror
attack or not.
The American people finally are starting
to focus on the lies, duplicity, greed, arrogance, incompetence
and general mean-spiritedness of Bush and his cohorts. They are
not doing so just because of an upcoming election, but because those
policies are doing great damage to each of us each day -- to the
economy, to our jobs and job-security, to our health care, to our
air we breathe and water we drink, to our crumbling infrastructure,
to our declining and disappearing public services, to our inadequate
school systems, to our sense of ourselves as a moral, forward-looking
nation.
BEWARE OF CORNERED BEASTS
Bush's "re-elect" numbers are plummeting,
his performance ratings are falling, his popularity is sinking.
The arrogant hubris that got him to the top, and that so flummoxed
his opposition for so long, is coming home to roost. He and his
cronies have been found out, and they'll be bounced out -- and few
will mourn their going from power, not even many true conservatives,
horrified at how their party has been hijacked by greedy, power-hungry
neo-cons, who have turned the Administration into a take-the-money-and-run
system and into a huge, Big Brotherish police-state enterprise.
But cornered snakes are the most dangerous.
One can only guess at the dirty tricks and surprises that Karl Rove
and his operatives have in store for the Democratic nominee, and
for us as a people. But those sleazy tactics may not work as well
this time. At last, Bush and his neo-con friends are wounded, and
may, through the determined and persistent opposition of an aroused
public, be brought down.
But these guys are not going to go easily. They fought like tigers
to get installed in power, and they will fight with every weapon,
legit or criminal, in their arsenal. That is why it is incumbent
on each of us -- liberal, conservative, moderate, independent, libertarian
-- to gear up, now, to help defeat the Bush&Co. crowd in November.
(This assumes that in the wake of a new terrorist attack, any Bush
attempt to impose martial law on the country -- "postponing"
the election until the "war on terror" is concluded --
will be successfully resisted.)
HOLDING ONE'S NOSE
That means, if necessary, our willingness
to vote for the Democratic candidate, even if we don't agree with
certain aspects of his program. That means sending money to, and
volunteering time for, whomever the Dem candidate turns out to be.
That means registering as many new voters as possible in the next
few months. That means pressuring the election officials in our
various states and counties to disallow touch-screen computer voting
until or if the software problems can be made transparent and are
fixed -- and until alternative machines can be purchased that provide
a paper trail for verification. That means talking to friends and
neighbors and colleagues about the dire situation in which we find
ourselves under Bush -- and, if he were to win, the even more egregious
things that will transpire after the election -- and the absolute
need to change course.
Our country finds itself in one of those
periods when the shadow forces have emerged to take us back to darker,
more authoritarian and rigid times. But shafts of light are beginning
to pour through more and more cracks in the Bush&Co. edifice.
The force of light is coalescing across the country, and, if we
do our job correctly, will aid in swinging history's pendulum away
from the shadow world into a new dawn of hope and progress.
Always, our eyes have to remain on the prize:
to break the back and momentum of the Bush&Co. juggernaut. Once
they are out of the White House, we can work to undo all the damage
they have done (and are doing right now) and set about to push for
true reforms and progressive programs. We will re-light the lamps
of righteousness, and illuminate the path to a better country for
all.
What you are willing to do will depend on
which vision of America you favor. Which America do you want to
live in?
Let's get to work
Bernard Weiner, Ph.D., has taught
government & international relations at various colleges, served
as a writer/editor with the San Francisco Chronicle for 19 years,
and currently co-edits The Crisis Papers
My response is on the following pages:
[ Part 1 ][ Part
2 ][ Part 3 ][ Part
4 ][ Part 5 ][ Part
6 ][ Part 7 ]
|